From 103677f1a14fe1aec281a69e5d68bbc72335dd9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Aalmoes <jan.aalmoes@inria.fr>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 18:42:27 +0100
Subject: classification finie en anglais

---
 classification_finie/tabular.tex | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 classification_finie/tabular.tex

(limited to 'classification_finie/tabular.tex')

diff --git a/classification_finie/tabular.tex b/classification_finie/tabular.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca2caaa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/classification_finie/tabular.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+\FloatBarrier
+\begin{figure}
+    \centering
+    \begin{subfigure}{0.44\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure/ba/COMPAS.pdf}
+        \caption{COMPAS}
+    \end{subfigure}
+    \begin{subfigure}{0.44\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure/ba/LAW.pdf}
+        \caption{LAW}
+    \end{subfigure}
+
+    \caption{Comparison of balanced accuracies betwen a random forest and our algorithm.
+    On COMPAS the balanced accuray are similar but on LAW we observe that random forest performs slightly better than random guess when our algorithm manages a 64\% balanced accuracy on average}
+    \label{fig:ba}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+    \centering
+    \begin{subfigure}{0.44\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure/time/COMPAS.pdf}
+        \caption{COMPAS}
+    \end{subfigure}
+    \begin{subfigure}{0.44\textwidth}
+        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure/time/LAW.pdf}
+        \caption{LAW}
+    \end{subfigure}
+
+    \caption{Comparison of computing times betwen a random forest and our algorithm.
+    On both dataset, the computing time of our algorithm is multiple factor of magnitude smaller than a random forest.
+    }
+    \label{fig:time}
+\end{figure}
+\FloatBarrier
-- 
cgit v1.2.3