diff options
author | Jan Aalmoes <jan.aalmoes@inria.fr> | 2024-08-21 15:16:56 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jan Aalmoes <jan.aalmoes@inria.fr> | 2024-08-21 15:16:56 +0200 |
commit | de796789bfc217c14e91a27dbbc70d96c5261b8f (patch) | |
tree | 5be5bb479a01b6688ad0d8e71c468dee01977467 /biblio.bib | |
parent | 506c5f8857957aaf23e43c60ef25ae0596463a0f (diff) |
notes sur her et 2001
Diffstat (limited to 'biblio.bib')
-rw-r--r-- | biblio.bib | 98 |
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -353,6 +353,38 @@ series = {AIES '18} ################################ #Définition +@article{baum2017survey, + title={A survey of artificial general intelligence projects for ethics, risk, and policy}, + author={Baum, Seth}, + journal={Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Working Paper}, + pages={17--1}, + year={2017} +} + +@inproceedings{kuppa2021towards, + title={Towards improving privacy of synthetic datasets}, + author={Kuppa, Aditya and Aouad, Lamine and Le-Khac, Nhien-An}, + booktitle={Annual Privacy Forum}, + pages={106--119}, + year={2021}, + organization={Springer} +} +@inproceedings{arpit2017closer, + title={A closer look at memorization in deep networks}, + author={Arpit, Devansh and Jastrzebski, Stanislaw and Ballas, Nicolas and Krueger, David and Bengio, Emmanuel and Kanwal, Maxinder S and Maharaj, Tegan and Fischer, Asja and Courville, Aaron and Bengio, Yoshua and others}, + booktitle={International conference on machine learning}, + pages={233--242}, + year={2017}, + organization={PMLR} +} +@inproceedings{feldman2020does, + title={Does learning require memorization? a short tale about a long tail}, + author={Feldman, Vitaly}, + booktitle={Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing}, + pages={954--959}, + year={2020} +} + @book{theetete, title={Théétète}, author={Platon}, @@ -387,6 +419,10 @@ series = {AIES '18} title={Dictionaire de l'Académie francaise, 9° édition}, note={\url{http://www.dictionnaire-academie.fr/article/A9A2706},Dernier accès: 2024-08-05} } +@book{dico-con, + title={Dictionaire de l'Académie francaise, 9° édition}, + note={\url{https://www.dictionnaire-academie.fr/article/A9C3633},Dernier accès: 2024-08-16} +} @misc{underscore, title={Cette nouvelle IA est bluffante}, author={Chaîne Youtube Underscore}, @@ -409,6 +445,55 @@ series = {AIES '18} ######################################### #Philosophie +@misc{afi100, + title={100 YEARS...100 MOVIES}, + author={AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE}, + howpublished={\url{https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies-10th-anniversary-edition/}}, + note={Dernier accès: 2024-08-21} +} + + +@article{bernays1928manipulating, +author = {Bernays, Edward L.}, +title = {Manipulating Public Opinion: The Why and The How}, +journal = {American Journal of Sociology}, +volume = {33}, +number = {6}, +pages = {958-971}, +year = {1928}, +doi = {10.1086/214599}, +URL = { + + https://doi.org/10.1086/214599 +}, +eprint = { + + https://doi.org/10.1086/214599 +} +, + abstract = { Public opinion, narrowly defined, is the thought of a society at a given time toward a given object; broadly conceived, it is the power of the group to sway the larger public in its attitude. Public opinion can be manipulated, but in teaching the public how to ask for what it wants the manipulator is safeguarding the public against his own possible aggressiveness. The method of the experimental psychologist is not as effective in the study of public opinion in the broad sense as is that of introspective psychology. To create and to change public opinion it is necessary to understand human motives, to know what special interests are represented by a given population, and to realize the function and limitations of the physical organs of approach to the public, such as the radio, the platform, the movie, the letter, the newspaper, etc. If the general principles of swaying public opinion are understood, a technique can be developed which, with the correct appraisal of the specific problem and the specific audience, can and has been used effectively in such widely different situations as changing the attitudes of whites toward Negroes in America, changing the buying habits of American women from felt hats to velvet, silk, and straw hats, changing the impression which the American electorate has of its President, introducing new musical instruments, and a variety of others. Group adherence is essential in changing the attitudes of the public. Authoritative and influential groups may become important channels of reaching the larger public. Ideas and situations must be made impressive and dramatic in order to overcome the inertia of established traditions and prejudices. } +} + + + +@article{fearing1947influence, +author = {Franklin Fearing}, +title ={Influence of the Movies on Attitudes and Behavior}, + +journal = {The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science}, +volume = {254}, +number = {1}, +pages = {70-79}, +year = {1947}, +doi = {10.1177/000271624725400112}, + +URL = { + https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624725400112 +}, +eprint = { + https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624725400112 +} +} @article{Singler_2018, title={Roko’s Basilisk or Pascal’s? Thinking of Singularity Thought Experiments as Implicit Religion}, volume={20}, url={https://journal.equinoxpub.com/IR/article/view/3226}, DOI={10.1558/imre.35900}, abstractNote={In 2010 a thought experiment speculating on the motivations and aims of a potential superintelligent Artificial Intelligence, sometimes known as the &amp;lsquo;Singularity&amp;rsquo;, caused uproar and anxiety on the forum board where it was initially posted. This paper considers that thought experiment&amp;rsquo;s debt to older forms of religious argument, the reactions from among the community, and how expectations about the Singularity as a being with agency can be considered to be an example of implicit religion. This is significant as the thought experiment appeared in a field of research, AI, considered by many to be secular due to its technological focus. The communities under discussion also explicitly express their aim of &amp;lsquo;perfecting&amp;rsquo; human rationality, and place that ability in opposition to &amp;lsquo;religion&amp;rsquo; as a derided object and the aims of &amp;lsquo;Goddists&amp;rsquo; in general. This tension between overt atheism and secular communities&amp;rsquo; return to religious tropes and narratives is relevant for the wider study of religion in the contemporary era.}, number={3}, journal={Implicit Religion}, author={Singler, Beth}, year={2018}, month={May}, pages={279–297} } @misc{matrix, @@ -417,6 +502,19 @@ series = {AIES '18} year={1999} } +@misc{her, + title={Her}, + author={Jonze, Spike}, + year={2013} +} + +@misc{johansson, + title={Scarlett Johansson’s Statement About Her Interactions With Sam Altman}, + howpublished={\url{https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/20/technology/scarlett-johansson-openai-statement.html}}, + note={Dernier accès: 2024-08-21} +} + + @book{bicentenaire, title={The Bicentennial Man}, author={Asimov,Isaac}, |